Suchergebnisse
Filter
24 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Taking Corporate Bankruptcy Fiduciary Duties Seriously
In: Journal of Corporation Law, Band 49
SSRN
Protecting Ma And Pa: Bond Workouts And The Trust Indenture Act In The 21st Century
In: Cardozo Law Review, Band 44
SSRN
SSRN
Puerto Rico; Act III
In: Forthcoming in Capital Markets Law Journal (2020)
SSRN
Working paper
Fairness and Flexibility: Understanding Corporate Bankruptcy's Arc
In: University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, Band 23
SSRN
Working paper
The Impossibility of TLAC
In: 23 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y --- (2020, Forthcoming).
SSRN
Always Crashing In The Same Car – Clearinghouse Rescue After Dodd-Frank
In: Journal of Financial Regulation, Band 3, Heft 2, S. September 2017
SSRN
PROMESA and the Bankruptcy Clause: A Reminder About Uniformity
In: Brook. J. Corp., Fin. & Com. Law (Forthcoming)
SSRN
Sovereign Bankruptcy Hydraulics
In: NYU Annual Survey of American Law, Forthcoming
SSRN
Subsidizing Liquidity or Subsidizing Markets? Safe Harbors, Derivatives, and Finance
In: Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper
SSRN
Working paper
Nationalize the Clearinghouses!
In: Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 2458506
SSRN
Working paper
Thoughts on Single Point of Entry
In: Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 2392450
SSRN
Working paper
A New Understanding of the Bankruptcy Clause
In: Case Western Reserve Law Review, Band 64
SSRN
Financial Institutions in Bankruptcy
In this Article, I argue that there are significant gaps in the federal system for resolving financial distress in a financial firm even after passage of the Dodd-Frank bill. These gaps represent potential sources of systemic risk—that is, risk to the financial system as a whole. They must be fixed. But I should make clear at the outset that I do not argue that these gaps must be filled with the Bankruptcy Code. Rather, the point is that the various systems for resolving financial distress among financial firms must be integrated so that the result of financial distress is clear and predictable. Integrating all under the Bankruptcy Code is an option, but not the only way to achieve such clarity. The first Part of this Article sketches the several existing systems for resolving financial distress in financial firms, including the new resolution authority created by the Dodd-Frank Act. By my count, there are at least six systems at work here, not counting state-by-state variations. Part II examines the coverage of these systems and the uncertainty created by the interaction of the same. For example, under current law, a large hedge fund might be "resolved" under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, or it might not be. The decision rests with the systemic risk counsel. Therefore, the fund's counterparties will be unable to determine ahead of time which set of rules is incorporated into their contracts with the hedge fund. Undoubtedly, both will be priced with a further discount for the uncertainty. That is unlikely to be the optimal solution. Part III of the Article then considers the ways in which the divide between finance and bankruptcy could be narrowed, if not eliminated. Ultimately, I doubt the plausibility of solving these issues with some grand solution like drafting a unified bankruptcy law. The political realities involved in getting a major piece of legislation through Congress are so daunting nowadays that it is something of a wonder that even Dodd-Frank, with all its limitations, passed. A unified system ...
BASE